Posts Tagged: expert advice

Science policy
Budget 2018: The Evidence Budget
March 8, 2018
1
, , , ,
In our post last week on the 2018–19 Canadian federal budget, we looked at how the new spending on fundamental research addresses the calls for support from the Naylor report. But there were many more science stories in the budget as well. Beyond the dollar figures, there are important—if tacit—signals in the budget document about another key item from the science file in Canada: using evidence to build policy. Today’s post attempts to decipher those tacit signals.
Science policy
Budget 2018: the fundamental question of research funding
February 28, 2018
3
, , , ,
Science has been quite prominent on the Canadian political radar in recent years, and even became a regular talking point during the last federal election in 2015. During that campaign, the current Liberal government made four headline promises, and with the release yesterday of the 2018–19 federal budget, one of the key puzzle pieces fell into place: increased funding for fundamental research. In today’s post, we’ll assess the budget’s meaning for science in Canada.
Evaluation
Maximizing the use of evaluation findings
February 21, 2018
2
, , ,
In a 2006 survey of 1,140 American Evaluation Association members, 68% reported that their evaluation results were not used. This suggests a serious need for evaluation results to make it off the bookshelf and into the hands of intended audiences. This week’s blog post looks at how we, as evaluators, can help maximize the use of the evaluations we produce.
Evaluation
Program evaluation basics
February 14, 2018
0
, , ,
The ScienceMetrics blog has so far focused on our scientometric, data mining and science policy activities, but we also have a long history of conducting evaluations of S&T-related programs and initiatives. In my opinion, the most fun to be had on the job is when we team up to combine our quantitative and qualitative analysis skills on a project. To kick off a series of posts from the evaluation side of Science-Metrix, in this post I’ll present an introductory Q&A on program evaluation, and next week I’ll discuss how to maximize the use of evaluation findings. Read on for the what, why, when and how of program evaluation.
Science policy
Science advice in Canada: reborn again?
February 7, 2018
1
, , ,
Science advice is apparently having a “moment” right now in Canada. Quebec has had a chief scientist since 2011, but both the federal government and the Ontario provincial government named chief science advisors in the second half of 2017. For the first time, at the end of January 2018, the three chief scientists appeared publicly together, on a panel organized by the Institute for Science, Society and Policy (ISSP) at the University of Ottawa. This attracted no small number of science policy nerds. While the event was billed as a new renaissance for science advice, that does raise the question of when exactly its prior incarnations occurred. In today’s post, we’ll present a summary of the discussions, along with some critical reflections.
Science policy
The new face of the science–policy interface
November 21, 2017
2
, , , ,
The new Chief Science Advisor position is the top job at the science–policy interface in Canada. While attending the 9th Canadian Science Policy Conference in Ottawa earlier this month, the other conference-goers and I were lucky to get a glimpse of how Dr. Mona Nemer—newly named to the job—understands evidence-based decision-making. In this week’s post, I’ll give a summary of her remarks at the CSPC and distill the main views on evidence-based decision-making that they seem to reflect.
Higher education Science policy
Policy: whose problem is it anyway?
March 14, 2017
0
, , , , , , ,
In January, Sir Peter Gluckman—Chief Science Advisor to the PM of New Zealand, and global point man for science advice to government—gave the inaugural address at the Canadian Science Policy Centre lecture series. The discussion covered a lot of important points of difficulty for science and governance—and science in governance—that are emerging in the 21st […]
Higher education Science policy
Committee Outsiders: a quick win
March 7, 2017
0
, , , , ,
In a previous post on the need to “operationalize” policy questions into a format suitable for empirical research, I ended with a call to action for the community of academic historians and philosophers of science to come down from our ivory towers, roll up our sleeves, and apply our skills to mediate negotiations taking place […]
Science policy
Capturing imaginations, not wallets and podiums
February 28, 2017
0
, , , , , , , ,
The notion of capture—when one group in a partnership is allowed “home-field advantage”—is helpful in understanding some hurdles to successful collaboration across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries. Last week, I outlined how sectoral capture undermines the very notion of transdisciplinary research. In this week’s installment of the capture series, I’ll talk about how sectoral capture is […]
Science policy
Expert advice on experts giving advice
July 8, 2016
0
, , , ,
Subject-matter experts are often called upon (or at least in a position) to provide their considered opinion on a matter of public policy. While the lab, the classroom and conference table are all terra cognita for a researcher, the halls of legislative and executive buildings are usually less familiar haunts. Accordingly, some time can be […]