Posts Tagged: interdisciplinarity

Data mining Science policy
Data mining: revisiting our definition
October 4, 2017
, , ,
In our ongoing blog series on data mining for policy, we’ve been trying to synthesize a lot of information into short, bite-sized chunks for our audience. Invariably, well-intentioned as such efforts are, something valuable always ends up on the cutting room floor. In this case, we were a bit too hasty in providing the definition of data mining itself, which one of our readers followed up to ask about. Our initial definition was put together through literature review and our earliest experiences with data mining, but the opportunity to revisit that definition more recently has enabled us to uncover some further nuances that we hadn’t yet appreciated.
Science policy
Capturing imaginations, not wallets and podiums
February 28, 2017
, , , , , , , ,
The notion of capture—when one group in a partnership is allowed “home-field advantage”—is helpful in understanding some hurdles to successful collaboration across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries. Last week, I outlined how sectoral capture undermines the very notion of transdisciplinary research. In this week’s installment of the capture series, I’ll talk about how sectoral capture is […]
Higher education Science policy
Transdisciplinary research: a recipe for sectoral capture
February 21, 2017
, , , , , ,
Now that I’ve put pen to paper and presented the notion of sectoral capture, I can finally put it to use! In this post, I’ll be exploring how sectoral capture is not only a huge risk in transdisciplinary research, but is actually embedded in the very definition of transdisciplinary research itself, calling for us to […]
Higher education Science policy
Flagging problems of capture
February 14, 2017
, , , , , , ,
The notion of disciplinary capture is a very useful conceptual tool, introduced in slightly different contexts: Brister (2016) in relation to the dynamics within interdisciplinary teams, and Frodeman, Briggle & Holbrook (2012) as well as Briggle and Frodeman (2016) in relation to the way that departmental and other academic structures influence the direction of philosophical […]
Bibliometrics Database Higher education Leiden Manifesto Science policy
Interdisciplinarity: the mutual adjustment of concept and indicator
December 8, 2016
, , , , ,
In their recently released report, Digital Science describe and assess the relationship between a range of candidate indicators for interdisciplinarity. Their objective is to assess the consistency between the indicators and attempt to discern a front runner in this race. Ultimately, though, they conclude that the indicators produce inconsistent findings, and finish with some remarks […]
Bibliometrics Science policy
Taxonomy, objectivity and expectation
June 6, 2016
, ,
Measuring interdisciplinarity relies on objective taxonomies of science, but how does science policy influence this perceived objectivity and how can acknowledging this influence improve the construction of taxonomies?